Just stumbled across a whole bunch of “smart money address profile” screenshots—everything’s got labels, clusters, and sets that come in pairs. It makes me want to laugh, but also a little nervous. To put it plainly, these things can only be used as clues, not a verdict: if the same person uses a dozen-plus wallets, crosses two bridges, and then mixes again, your “fund flow” starts to go off the rails and you can end up self-hyping it. And on top of that, these days between L2s it’s a daily battle of TPS, transaction fees, and subsidies—everyone’s steering traffic. On-chain behavior gets twisted by “activity rules” so badly it looks like it’s been kneaded into dough. So if you slap a “whale/institution” label on it, do people just really believe it? I’d rather look a few more times at interaction habits and the paths for entering and exiting bridges—at least when something goes wrong with a bridge, the blame can usually be traced and matched correctly… Anyway, don’t put your faith in profiles—especially don’t use them as a reason to enter the market.