These days, I’ve come across a few NFT projects talking about "returning to the floor price as a consensus," basically saying that the floor is just a thermometer of liquidity; when it's hot, everyone pretends to believe in the narrative, and when it's cold, all that's left are listings staring at each other. The royalty issue is also quite awkward—if you turn it on, trading becomes more scarce; if you turn it off, the community says you're disrespecting creators... Anyway, in the end, it seems like someone outside has to step in to take over (a slight sarcastic tone).

Personally, I mainly look at whether the NFT pool is deep and if there are real buyers on the secondary market; otherwise, "a strong community" sounds a bit like the chain game model: inflation kicks in, studios enter the scene, the token price takes a sharp turn, and the narrative immediately cools down.
I'm a conservative type, preferring to earn a little less, at least not staying up at night staring at the floor price until I can't sleep.