Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
#Gate广场五月交易分享
The capital seesaw effect reappears—Bitcoin sucking blood from gold?
Recently, the most “money-attracting” asset in the financial markets besides U.S. stocks is Bitcoin, which today surged strongly past $80,500, shining brightly. In stark contrast, gold fell below $4,600, losing momentum. Ironically, a similar situation occurred earlier this year, when gold was once praised and broke through $5,500, while Bitcoin was ignored, dropping below $60,000. Just a few months later, the situation reversed completely. Does this switch in status imply the reemergence of the capital seesaw effect, with Bitcoin biting back and draining the gold market?
1. Core phenomenon: structural differentiation in capital rotation
Real-time price divergence
Bitcoin: Broke $80k (RMB 552k) on May 5, 2026, with a daily increase of 1.13%, rebounding 45% from April lows;
Gold: Spot price hovers around $4,587 per ounce, down 18% from the early-year high, ETF holdings drop to the lowest since 2024.
Historical ratio change
Bitcoin/gold ratio fell from the 2025 peak of 40 ounces per BTC (1 BTC = 40 ounces of gold) to the current 17.4 ounces per BTC, but remains above the 10-year average (8-12 ounces), indicating Bitcoin’s relative valuation advantage still exists.
2. The fundamental driving force behind capital flow
(1) Sensitivity differences to liquidity
Bitcoin: Highly sensitive to global financial liquidity
After the Fed paused interest rate hikes, leverage in the crypto market quickly rebounded (perpetual contract funding rates turned positive)
Spot ETF weekly net inflow of $2.4 billion, accounting for 15% of daily trading volume
Gold: Suppressed by real interest rates and the dollar
U.S. 10-year TIPS yield rose to 1.8%, a new high since 2025
Dollar index stabilized above 108, increasing gold holding costs
(2) Rebuilding risk attributes
Bitcoin attracts young capital with its narrative of digital safe-haven asset, while gold is sold off by institutions for dollars during liquidity crises.
(3) On-chain data reveals capital migration:
Bitcoin on-chain activity cools but whale accumulation increases:
Active addresses drop to 890k/day (a 2-year low), but addresses holding >1,000 BTC rise to 41.5%
Gold ETF continues to bleed:
Global gold ETF outflows for 11 consecutive weeks, with total holdings down by 197 tons (about $12 billion)
3. Medium- and long-term positioning: complementary rather than substitutive
Bitcoin: a volatile asset for the digital age
Advantages:
Driven by halving cycles that increase scarcity (block rewards to drop to 0.78 BTC in 2028)
Accelerating institutionalization (U.S. government holds 330k BTC, accounting for 1.6% of circulating supply)
Bottlenecks:
Volatility exceeds 80% (gold only 15%), not yet incorporated into mainstream reserve assets
Gold: the ultimate anchor of the credit system
Indispensability:
Global central banks increased gold holdings by 228 tons in Q1 2026, with China’s reserves rising to 4.9%
Millennium currency consensus supports its ability to resist extreme risks (such as sovereign debt crises)
Practical constraints:
Physical delivery is inefficient and difficult to meet the transaction needs of the digital era