Solana co-founder: “AI poses a greater threat to cryptography than quantum”… Multi-signature solutions draw attention

Solana (SOL) Co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko warns that the greatest threat of “post-quantum cryptography” may not be quantum computers, but artificial intelligence (AI). He points out that AI could be the first to find vulnerabilities in defensive signature systems.

‘Falcon’ verification costs decrease, but security debates further intensify

This discussion began with Solana developer Dean Littler sharing the implementation results of ‘Falcon’. He stated that the verification cost for version 0.1.2 has been reduced to approximately 173,000–183,000 CU. Subsequently, he previewed future work involving Lean and Kani proofs. Based on this, Yakovenko proposed that native support should be provided within transaction processing structures using PDA.

Yakovenko: “AI can also crack PQC signatures”

He said, “The biggest risk is that PQC signature systems could be cracked by AI,” and added, “We cannot fully understand all implementation traps, nor all mathematical vulnerabilities.” Therefore, his stance is to support a ‘2/3’ multi-signature system rather than relying solely on a single signature method. He believes that using multiple cryptographic techniques simultaneously at both wallet and transaction processor levels creates a more secure structure.

No deviation from Solana’s official stance

In a developer article on April 27, Solana explained that the threat of quantum computers remains a “problem for many years,” and that relevant transition work has been thoroughly researched if needed. Its roadmap is to implement post-quantum signatures for new wallet applications and migrate existing wallets based on the chosen method.

Currently, Solana’s research focus is converging on ‘Falcon’. The Anza and Firedancer teams have independently reached the same conclusion that a compact and fast signature format suitable for network scale is needed. Solana states that the initial implementation code has been published, and the transition will not impose a significant performance burden.

The key lies in the ‘possibility of transition’ and the ‘risk of relying on a single system’

Yakovenko’s comments do not negate Solana’s roadmap but further refine the focus. The point is that, compared to whether to switch to post-quantum cryptography, it is more important to prevent AI from discovering weaknesses in new systems.

Therefore, Yakovenko favors a ‘2/3’ approach with different signature systems. This is a defense strategy that does not depend on a single cryptographic principle but stacks multiple verification mechanisms. When Mikhail Yegorov, founder of Curve Finance, asked whether formal verification could be an alternative, Yakovenko responded cautiously, saying, “It is only possible when you precisely know what needs to be verified.”

Market attention on Solana’s security roadmap

While discussions on post-quantum cryptography still seem distant, this again highlights the importance of proactive measures for large blockchains. Especially as Solana faces the challenge of maintaining high-speed processing while enhancing security, this statement is not only about technological development but also related to long-term reliability.

Currently, Solana (SOL) is trading at $84.03. Yakovenko’s warning that AI might expose cryptographic vulnerabilities earlier than quantum computers suggests that Solana’s ‘quantum readiness’ should not be a simple upgrade but must expand into a multi-layered security strategy.

Article summary by TokenPost.ai 🔎 Market interpretation Solana co-founder emphasizes that AI can discover cryptographic vulnerabilities faster than quantum computers, indicating that security paradigms are expanding from ‘quantum preparedness’ to ‘AI countermeasures’. Post-quantum signatures based on Falcon remain a trend, but vigilance against reliance on a single technology is increasing. 💡 Strategic points Adopt a 2/3 multi-signature structure to diversify risk Applying multiple cryptographic algorithms in wallets and transaction layers is crucial To address the era of AI-based vulnerability detection, formal verification and structural defenses must be advanced simultaneously 📘 Terminology explanations PQC (Post-Quantum Cryptography): Cryptographic techniques designed to resist quantum computer attacks Falcon: A fast, lightweight PQC digital signature algorithm Multi-sig (Multi-signature): A structure that enhances security by combining multiple signatures or keys

💡 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q. Why is AI considered a bigger threat than quantum computers? Quantum computers are still years away from practical application, but AI can already quickly identify errors or subtle structural weaknesses in cryptographic implementations. It can even detect mathematical vulnerabilities that humans have not noticed, making it a more immediate threat. Q. Why is Falcon signature so highly regarded? Falcon is a fast, small-sized post-quantum signature method suitable for high-speed blockchain environments like Solana. Since its initial implementation is open and can be integrated without impacting performance, it is seen as a practical alternative. Q. What are the advantages of a 2/3 multi-signature structure? It is a structure that uses different cryptographic methods simultaneously, so even if one method is compromised, the entire system remains protected. Especially in the AI era, reliance on a single algorithm poses risks, making multi-layer defenses increasingly important.

TP AI notes: This summary was generated using TokenPost.ai’s language model. It may omit key content from the main text or be inconsistent with facts.