Does Trump want to "escort the Strait of Hormuz"? This move looks a lot like a live sales broadcast!

If international politics are compared to a live shopping stream, then Trump's "escort of the Strait of Hormuz" is almost like personally shouting, "Family, let's go all out." The question is—what exactly is he selling? Security, or presence?
What is the Strait of Hormuz? The "throat" of global oil transportation. Once there’s any disturbance, oil prices soar as if someone stepped on the gas. So whenever something happens here, the global markets automatically switch to "tension mode."
And Trump's "escort theory" is essentially a familiar routine: create tension first, then offer a solution. Doesn't that sound a lot like business logic? First tell you the problem is serious, then say only I can fix it.
But the question is, does the market really buy it? Historically, such tough statements often stimulate short-term emotions, but the medium- and long-term effects are limited. Capital cares more about—has the risk truly decreased, rather than who talks louder.
So this "escort" move is more like a political performance: it stabilizes supporters and influences energy market expectations at the same time. As for the outcome? The market might first rally on sentiment, then calm down and continue to watch the fundamentals.
In one sentence: the show is quite elaborate, but whether oil prices will cooperate depends on the "audience's" mood. #美国寻求战略比特币储备