The recent wave of cutting royalties in the secondary market is basically a tug-of-war between "creator income" and "transaction friction." The data is quite straightforward: when trading cools down, everyone immediately cuts royalties; when trading heats up, they start calling for respect for creators... I don’t have any moral high ground either. As a voting participant, I care more about whether the mechanism can be self-consistent: royalties should either be fixed at the protocol level and enforced strictly; or just be honest about it—switch to voluntary tipping and rights feedback, don’t expect exchanges/markets to shoulder the blame.



By the way, regarding the mainnet chain upgrade, everyone in the group is speculating whether projects will migrate. I think whether they migrate or not isn’t about being stubborn; it’s about the ledger: migration costs, user pathways, royalty enforcement capabilities—what’s more realistic. Anyway, I’ll finish reading the governance proposals first. The show can go on, but the votes still need to be cast.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin