In the past few days, I've seen everyone shouting "On-chain privacy is necessary," but also fearing a comprehensive crackdown on compliance. To be honest, the expectations of ordinary users shouldn't be too romantic: privacy is more like "being less watched by strangers," not "completely invisible." If someone is really watching your address or behavior trajectory, it's almost impossible to escape; at most, it just increases the cost for others to track you.



Now hardware wallets are out of stock, phishing links are everywhere, and it feels like many people treat "privacy tools" as talismans. But they end up falling for fake official websites and fake airdrops first... (I almost clicked on one myself, my hand was faster than my brain). Anyway, I have one principle now: it's better to operate with a bit more trouble than to tempt fate; privacy is desired, but don't test the red line of compliance—life is more important than face. That's all for now.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin