Recently, I've seen everyone focus on staking unlocks, token unlock schedules, and daily worries about selling pressure.

I'm actually more interested in another aspect: how much on-chain privacy can really be maintained, and where compliance might cause issues.
To put it simply, the expectations of ordinary users shouldn't be too "cinematic"; on-chain isn't anonymous, it's "pseudonymous + traceable."
If you connect addresses, transaction habits, and deposit/withdrawal paths, it's often easier to identify than you think.

My current approach is quite simple: privacy tools can be used, but don't expect a one-click whitewash;
and definitely don't use them in obviously gray areas.
When you need to explain the source of funds, keep records of on-chain transactions, reasons for trades, and screenshots ready, so you won't be caught off guard when asked for documentation later.
Don't think you can bypass KYC (identity verification); anyway, major platforms will eventually require you to clarify.
What you can do is: don't insist on transparency where it's unnecessary, and don't go naked where protection is needed—having a sense of boundaries is more realistic than "completely anonymous."