Recently looking at several DAO voting pages, the more I look, the more they resemble "delegation entry design": default to giving your vote to the top proxy, the list always has the same few people, click twice and you're done, it's convenient but who ultimately governs the tokens? Basically, it's outsourcing decision-making to a few people, just leaving a record on the chain.

What's more awkward is that many people's first reaction to getting tokens isn't to look at proposals, but to find "who can help me vote." Social mining, fan tokens, that set of "attention as mining," I also have some doubts: attention is indeed measured, but what is measured is interaction, not judgment. Anyway, I'm now more concerned about the permission prompts and revoke buttons in my wallet, just don't let me accidentally click and send my vote and authorization together. That's all for now.