Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
I'm not very good at talking about those flashy "new yields," but when it comes to LST/re-staking, honestly: money doesn't fall from the sky. The main source of LST's returns still comes from the "basic interest" generated by validators producing blocks, and re-staking uses the same security to "reuse" across multiple places. The returns look higher, but in reality, you're taking on extra risks: penalties and confiscations, contract vulnerabilities, liquidity crises, and even if one middle layer has an issue, everyone gets caught up.
Recently, developers are excited about modular and DAO layer narratives, while users are confused. I can empathize... the more layers you break down, the more complicated the sources of yield become. My approach is pretty simple: first ask "who is paying, and what risks are they taking?" If you can't answer, treat it as marketing talk, avoid it as much as possible, and sleep peacefully.