These days, there's been more arguing in the group about privacy coins and mixing coins—whether they count as "original sins." Honestly, I can understand both sides' emotions: one side feels that privacy is a basic right, while the other fears accidentally crossing compliance red lines. As for ordinary users, I think don't hold unrealistic expectations—it's not "just because I haven't done anything bad, I won't get in trouble," nor is it "using privacy tools will inevitably cause issues." It's more like risk exposure is there; the severity depends on how and where you use them.



My own expectation is quite simple: minimize leaving traces whenever possible, but don't treat privacy as a talisman. Moving across chains and having multiple addresses makes it even more important to recognize: some entry/exit points are more sensitive. If you really plan to use mixing coins or similar tools, first think carefully about whether you'll be able to explain your source of funds in the future and whether you can produce records. Anyway, I still stick to my usual approach: diversify positions, diversify paths, and try not to put myself in a position where I have to prove I’m clean. That’s all for now.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin