Recently, the group has been arguing again about "on-chain privacy" versus "compliance—who makes who."

I'm just someone who only reads proposals, and this kind of peripheral knowledge makes my head hurt...
Honestly, ordinary users shouldn't expect absolute anonymity, nor should they immediately see themselves as criminals.
On-chain transparency is like speaking in a public square; if you want to stay low-profile, you can only leave fewer traces and fewer links—don't expect one-click invisibility.
Compliance isn't meant to put you in jail; it's more about platforms and entry points having to report.
If you really want to move money into and out of traditional systems, being asked a couple of questions is basically expected.
As for recent interpretations linking ETF fund flows, U.S. stock risk appetite, and crypto market rises and falls, I honestly reacted a bit slowly...
After reading, I just want to turn it off.
Anyway, what I care more about is: don't click on random links, don't authorize your main wallet everywhere—privacy and security should be the minimum standards before talking about ideals.
That's all for now.