Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
just saw this wild Forbes ranking where a major crypto exchange founder supposedly hit $110 billion net worth, putting him in the top 20 richest people globally. wild stuff right? but here's where it gets interesting - the guy himself came out and basically said forbes got it wrong lol. he pointed out that crypto prices tanked over 50% already this year, so how does his net worth go up at the same time? doesn't add up. he also called out the math - they're saying his exchange generates like $5 billion annually but valuing his personal stake at $110 billion. the inconsistency is pretty glaring when you think about it. most of his wealth is obviously tied to his majority stake in the exchange plus his token holdings. even with the market downturn, he's still ranking as one of the wealthiest in tech and finance. but yeah, the whole valuation thing seems sus based on what he's saying. makes you wonder how accurate these billionaire rankings really are when the numbers don't match basic market reality.