The term “modularization” sounds quite academic. But put simply, there are only two things it means for ordinary people: first, after you click confirm, where exactly does it “land”? It may not be the same chain that’s doing the work. Second, when something goes wrong, the blame is spread out more—whichever part is stuck (data, settlement, execution). In terms of the experience, it usually comes down to transfers that are slow, confirmations that get stuck, or suddenly higher fees when you end up bouncing across chains.



Recently, around the upgrade/hard fork of that major public chain, everyone’s been guessing whether projects will migrate. I’m actually more concerned with the speed of the “liquidity withdrawal” phase before migration—on-chain funds run faster than the announcements. There are plenty of tutorials, but I generally only look at two types: how to locate the problem if things fail, and how to retreat/withdraw funds in the worst case, or how to verify that the funds are still there. It’s all exciting, but I want to think through the risk pathway first before anything else.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin