Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Opinion: Bitcoin should not accept 「confiscating Satoshi’s holdings」 in exchange for security, even if the threat of quantum computing comes.
BlockBeats News, May 3rd, Galaxy Digital Research Director Alex Thorn published an article stating that after discussions in Las Vegas with multiple Bitcoin developers, researchers, and quantum computing supporters, a partial consensus is forming in the industry regarding the issue of “Quantum Computing and Bitcoin.”
Thorn believes that most opinions support “not touching the early P2PK address assets held by Satoshi Nakamoto,” because doing so could undermine Bitcoin’s core principle of inviolable property rights. He points out that Satoshi Nakamoto is estimated to hold about 1.1 million BTC scattered across approximately 22k addresses, not a single “super vault,” and that the real large-scale risks come more from exchanges and other entities that can proactively upgrade to quantum-resistant addresses.
He also states that the industry generally supports early research into Bitcoin’s quantum-resistant cryptographic solutions, including development, testing, signature compression, and protocol discussions, even if ultimately only “as a backup reserve” it still holds significance.
However, Thorn also warns that pushing unverified quantum-resistant upgrades excessively could lead to protocol complexity, dispersed development resources, and community consensus deadlocks. He believes that even if quantum computing ultimately poses only a very low probability threat to Bitcoin, early discussions and technical preparations are still worthwhile.