Recently, on-chain activity has again been claiming that "coincidental transfers" are conspiracy theories, but many can actually be broken down into more normal paths: the same source of funds coming in in batches, passing through an aggregator or cross-chain bridge, then being dispersed from exchange hot wallets to a bunch of new addresses, looking like "mutual acquaintances," in reality just a pipeline-style arbitrage and risk control habit. Anyway, what I care more about now is whether the path can be closed in a loop, whether the time intervals and transaction fees are reasonable; only when they are unreasonable do I pay more attention. Meme attention has also gone full circle again—when a celebrity calls out, a bunch of people rush in. Veteran players advising newcomers not to take the last step really isn’t just pretending to be sober... I’ll just keep trimming my positions, slowly grow the stable pool, and wait for the rain.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin