Lately I've been really into browsing DAO proposals, and on the surface they say "optimizing incentives" and "increasing participation," but when you get to the end, it's really about who can propose, who can veto, and how voting rights are delegated... Basically, it's about redrawing the power map. The more attractive the rewards are, the more you have to watch out for whether the votes are being pulled into the hands of a few people, ultimately turning into "you vote, I decide." Additionally, before some mainstream blockchain upgrades, everyone is guessing whether projects will migrate; I think whether they migrate or not isn't just about what people say, but first look at whether governance permissions and incentives are tied to the old territory. Anyway, before I vote now, I always review: who is funding, who holds the votes, and who can change the rules—don't just look at the proposal titles that sound good.