Recently, everyone has been talking about AI Agents automatically on-chain, which sounds great, but I increasingly feel it should be a bit "slower." Many pitfalls on the chain aren't because the model isn't smart, but because it can't take the blame for you: who exactly was authorized, how much, and can it be revoked; whether contract permissions can be upgraded or transferred with a single click; and those small print details in cross-chain, signatures, and simulated transactions—when something goes wrong, a simple "I let the agent do it" won't solve it.

Especially now, with staking unlocks and token unlock calendars being repeatedly brought up, the pressure and anxiety to sell off spike, and agents might be more prone than humans to chase volatility and act impulsively. My approach is pretty simple: agents can help me monitor on-chain movements, run simulations, and offer suggestions, but the final steps—signing, changing permissions, moving large positions—must be done manually as a safety net. It's okay to be a bit slow; at least it won't turn "convenience" into "permanent authorization." That's how I'll proceed for now.