Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Just brushed up on the debate about whether secondary royalties should be mandatory, and casually looked at the transaction policies of several markets. To put it plainly, everyone is using "creator income" as a moral badge, but what really determines whether you get paid are liquidity and platform rules. Change the frontend/router and it’s gone; mandatory doesn’t necessarily mean truly enforced. What annoys me most is those who include royalty-free transactions in the "creator-friendly" data, making a false prosperity that makes my scalp tingle. Now L2s are competing daily on TPS, fees, and subsidies, but it’s all the same: the more competitive the metrics, the easier it is to hide "where the money comes from." Anyway, when I look at projects now, I first ask: who is paying the cash flow, and can it match the on-chain records.