Recently, I saw cross-chain bridges being hacked again, and oracles suddenly having erratic price feeds, and a bunch of people in the group are saying "wait for confirmation"... To be honest, when I evaluate project credibility now, my first look isn't at the K-line anymore. I’ll check GitHub by clicking in and glancing around: it’s not that I can write code, but I want to see if the updates are still active, if issues are being responded to, and if there are explanations for key upgrades—nothing that’s been stagnant for half a year. The same goes for audit reports; beginners shouldn’t be fooled by the words "audited," the focus should be on whether high-risk issues have been fixed, the fix timelines, and whether the versions are correct, preferably with corresponding commit records. Then there’s multi-signature upgrades—who holds the keys, what’s the threshold, is there a time lock—at least I want to know that when something goes wrong, it’s not just one person making arbitrary changes to the contract. Anyway, I’d rather take it slow and wait for that "consensus confirmation" before moving. That’s all for now.