Looking at DAO proposals, my first reaction isn't "vision," but rather to the part about incentives: who gets subsidies, who gets voting rights, who can change parameters. Frankly, many proposals are just rearranging the power structure and packaging it as "optimized governance." Especially those that continuously allocate budgets to a specific working group while tightening key permissions (like multi-signature wallets / parameter adjustments), I instinctively become cautious: this isn't governance, it's solidifying factions.

Recently, the wave of AI Agents and automated trading is the same; the narrative is hyped up, but in practice, it's just a bunch of contracts clicking buttons on-chain. You give the agent authorization, provide an "automatic proposal execution" interface, but then hide an incomprehensible routing or kickback in the proposal, and in the end, all slippage and fees are on you... I'd rather vote slowly than finish voting only to realize I'm paving the way for others. Anyway, I only look at three things in proposals: where the money comes from, who has the power, and whether there's an exit mechanism. Don't think I'm being overly strict; on-chain, there’s no room for sentimentality.