Recently, I saw the whole set of re-staking and shared security being criticized as a "copycat," basically meaning that as the returns stack up, so do the risks. If your private key layer isn't secure yet, no matter how much you discuss, it's pretty much pointless.



My rough method: if your assets aren't large yet and are mainly for daily use, a hardware wallet is enough—at least isolate signing from your computer and phone, so you don't slip up and install a plugin that exposes your entire holdings. When your assets grow larger and you plan to hold them long-term, multi-signature is more reliable; the trade-off is inconvenience: every transfer requires a few extra clicks and waiting for another person. As for social recovery, I see it more as "preventing loss" rather than "preventing hacking," suitable for those worried about losing their seed phrase. But only if you truly trust the guardians and practice it regularly; otherwise, you'll be flustered when you need it.

That's all for now. Tonight, I'll do a recovery drill with the multi-signature backup signing device again.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin