AI Agents can now help me monitor on-chain activity, route calculations, and even place orders themselves, but honestly, when it comes down to real issues, humans still need to take responsibility. For example, authorizations, cross-chain bridges, and encountering new contracts/new pools—these steps are most easily fooled by interfaces that look "normal." Even a smart Agent might just amplify errors more quickly. When liquidation waterfalls happen, it will execute according to the rules, but whether those rules should be changed or whether to cut positions early to save oneself—that kind of judgment I don't dare to leave to scripts.

Recently, with social mining and fan tokens—this "attention as mining" concept—I’ve been wondering if it’s all just a false proposition... Attention is certainly useful, but it’s also the easiest to manipulate, and Agents chasing hot topics tend to chase wildly. Anyway, my current approach is somewhat cautious: the Agent handles errands, humans handle braking, and all key signatures are done manually. I prefer it slow, so I don’t go all-in and get caught in a trap—that’s just too much to handle.