Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
Stock CFD Derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
3.8%
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
These past couple of days, I got caught in the "on-chain data" trap again while running new chain tasks: I clearly sent a transaction, but the block explorer wouldn't update for a long time, switching to a different RPC immediately showed success... I only then realized that node synchronization, RPC cache, and indexer database are not all synchronized; what I see as "on-chain" might be a processed version by someone else, and it can also be delayed.
After news of cross-chain bridge thefts, everyone started "waiting for confirmation," which I can understand; plus, with oracles occasionally glitching in their quotes, I increasingly feel that we shouldn't be too superstitious about a single front-end number. Honestly, I trust data more, but it has to be cross-verified from multiple sources: for the same transaction, I check several RPCs and explorers; I prefer to take my time to harvest, rather than be fooled by fake progress bars into rushing interactions. Anyway, mining is like bringing food, so I split the tasks into multiple parts to avoid crashes.