I set a rule for myself: when I see governance voting where "delegated to certain whales/organizations" takes up a large portion, don't get excited and rush to pick a side. First, check what they actually voted for and proposed. To put it simply, many governance tokens ultimately govern not the protocol itself, but the few people who hold the most tokens and are best at packaging themselves as "responsible for the community"... I've also been impulsive before, delegating for convenience, but after changing the routing, the slippage became even more outrageous, the pool behaviors more bizarre, and I kept a calm face while wanting to draw my sword inside. Recently, social mining and fan tokens have become popular, with the idea that "attention is mining." It sounds lively, but the attention mined is often just more attention for the oligarchs. Anyway, I won't be a free traffic source anymore.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin