I'm not very good at following the trend of shouting “fully automated intelligent agents will take over wallets” kind of narrative, but if you really put an AI Agent on-chain and let it run through things end to end, in the end it still comes down to people to provide the safety net. For example, during authorization, no matter how smart the robot is, it may treat unlimited approvals as “convenient.” Then someday if the contract runs into some weird issue, people will have to clean up the mess themselves; and as for cross-chain / pool swapping stuff—slippage, and liquidity suddenly getting pulled away—an Agent might still execute stubbornly based on the parameters, leaving you questioning your life. Then there are abnormal transactions, phishing links, and fake frontends: AI can identify some of these, but the old saying “take another look, don’t rush to confirm” is still pretty useful for now. On the macro side, rate-cut expectations have been swinging hot and cold lately; the US Dollar Index rising and falling in sync with risk assets has been noisy enough too… With these kinds of emotional switches, it’s hard for an Agent to judge whether you should cool things down. As for me, I just shut it off when the bread is about to burn—on-chain being too hot is the same. That’s it for now.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin