Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
GPT-5.5 "9.7T parameters" re-evaluated: after correction, only about 1.5T remain
CryptoWorld News reports that AI researchers Lawrence Chan and Benno Sturgeon have rechecked a paper by Pine AI Chief Scientist Li Bojie titled “Incompressible Knowledge Probes: Estimating the Parameter Count of Black-Box Large Language Models Based on Factual Capacity.” The original paper estimated GPT-5.5 at approximately 9.7T, Claude Opus 4.7 at about 4.0T, and O1 at around 3.5T. The recheck found that the original numbers were inflated due to the scoring methodology and question quality—especially due to improper handling of “floor scores,” which exaggerated the performance gap on difficult questions. After removing “floor scores,” the fitted slope fell from 6.79 to 3.56, r² dropped from 0.917 to 0.815, and the 90% prediction interval widened from 3.0 times to 5.7 times, indicating larger errors. The recheck also found that 131 questions had ambiguities or incorrect answers, accounting for 9.4%. Based on the corrected data, the parameter count for GPT-5.5 decreased from 9659B to 1458B, and the 90% prediction interval was 256B to 8311B. The recheck authors emphasized that 1.5T should not be taken as the true parameter count of GPT-5.5.