Does the U.S. want to stockpile Bitcoin?

This isn't just trading crypto; it's a "nation-level stockpiling upgrade."

First, a question:
If a country starts buying Bitcoin, is it still a "speculative asset"?
Recently, discussions about the U.S. potentially establishing a strategic Bitcoin reserve are a bit like suddenly moving air coins into the national treasury—sounds absurd, but the logic is increasingly convincing.

In the traditional world, countries stockpile gold and oil to cope with uncertainty.
And Bitcoin's special feature is: it doesn't belong to any country but is accepted worldwide.
This is somewhat like a "neutral asset."

The reversal comes—
its price volatility is greater than any reserve asset.
So the question becomes:
Can a "most unstable asset" play the "most stable role"?
The answer might not be substitution but rather supplementation.

Just like an investment portfolio, countries are also diversifying risk.
And Bitcoin might be that "high-volatility but highly independent" option.
But the key point is:
Once a country enters the market, it’s no longer just a market.

Here's the question:
When rule-makers also become players, do you think the game will become simpler or more complex?
#美国寻求战略比特币储备