$PI Whether choosing long-termism or short-termism is acceptable, they are just two different perspectives; long-termists bet on the future, while short-termists focus on the present. Long-termism experiences more fluctuations, and short-termism emphasizes quick gains in the short term, but often at the expense of the future. For example, the starting points of chip research in the East and West are actually quite similar, but the West has already realized that chips will become a key industry in the future, influencing the global landscape, so they choose long-termism, persisting in investment even when the future or success is uncertain. Today, everyone understands the importance of chips to the world. In the East, at that time, because chip investment cycles are long and returns are hard to see, they weighed the pros and cons and chose realism, transforming electronic component factories into quick-result industries like textiles and bicycles. Although these industries showed quick results, they lost the right to dialogue with the West in the chip field today. Whether choosing long-termism or realism, it is a personal choice, and the outcomes will inevitably differ. The path of Pi is currently quite difficult; short-term, it may not see returns, but in the long run, blockchain, Web3, and artificial intelligence are trends—advances in human technological civilization. The world needs them to reshape the new global order, solve problems, and they will be crucial in the future. Lu Xun said: "There was no road in the world, but when many people walk on it, it becomes a road." The same applies to Pi; this path has been followed by tens of millions of people alongside the project team. Currently, Pi still looks like a single-plank bridge, but ultimately, it will become a bright avenue. I choose this single-plank bridge of Pi because only by crossing it can I see the scenery others cannot, and have a future that others do not.