Lately I've come across a bunch of testnet point tutorials, and I feel a bit uncomfortable: originally, it was just practice, but everyone is forcing it into "expected returns." To be honest, once the expected return is established, people will automatically invest more time and effort, then start feeling dissatisfied.



My self-imposed stop-loss is pretty simple: first, calculate the "total cost" for each testnet—time, Gas fees, changing accounts and environments, mental exhaustion—all counted as money; stop once it exceeds that, no chasing tasks, no re-engaging. The second is informational stop-loss: if project rules change, treat it as a restart, the previous investments are considered sunk costs, and I won't deceive myself with "I've already done this."

Recently, with RWA and comparing US Treasury yields to on-chain yield products, it's the same story—basically packaging "possibility" as "certainty." Anyway, I’m currently just practicing with a learning mindset; as long as I learn the process, it’s a win, and points are just a bonus.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin