Recently reviewing several project governance votes, the more I look, the more it seems like "delegated voting = outsourcing your brain."

At first, everyone just wanted to save effort, handing their votes to a few seemingly professional people, but gradually those few became the ones making the decisions...
Honestly, who does the governance token really govern? It feels more like giving large holders a shell of procedural justice for their operations.
Ordinary people occasionally want to participate, but after opening a bunch of proposals that are long and convoluted, they end up just saying "Forget it, I delegate."
Plus, with recent regional tax hikes and compliance measures tightening and loosening unpredictably, deposit and withdrawal expectations fluctuate, making everyone lazier about governance and prioritizing liquidity and exit routes.
Anyway, I’m still the same, still watching the narrative and the market as long as I can sell the tokens, otherwise I just mint and shut down the software...
Let’s see.