Recently, people have been talking about IBC, message passing, various bridges, and it seems developers are very excited (modularization, the narrative of the data availability layer is back).


Users, on the other hand, are confused: isn’t it just “transferring” it over…?
Basically, a cross-chain transfer is really about trusting a chain of components and hoping nothing breaks down.
The consensus/finality of the chain itself is considered one layer; then comes the light client/verification method (who is actually “proving that the other chain really did something”);
next is relay/routing (who moves the message, will it glitch during transfer, can it be replayed);
finally, the on-chain contract/module (receiving the message, will execution be exploited).
People think cross-chain is just a one-click confirmation, but in reality, every additional middleware adds a new potential hazard.
Slippage hasn’t even appeared yet; the risk is hidden in the routing…
I now try to cross as little as possible, and when I do, I choose simpler paths.
I’d rather be slower, for now, that’s the way it is.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin