Recently, I saw those "coincidental transfer" screenshots again: A just finished transferring, B starts moving right after, and the comment section immediately jumps to conspiracy theories... I usually hold back my emotions first and break it down into several explainable scenarios: multiple addresses layered by the same person (such as hot and cold wallets), chain reactions caused by CEX consolidation/change addresses, and intermediary transfers in contract interactions (routers/multisigs) that extend the trace. Last week, I reviewed a third similar case and found that many "synchronizations" are actually multiple internal calls within the same transaction, which visually appear as consecutive transfers. Recently, some regions have increased taxes and tightened compliance, causing deposit and withdrawal expectations to change, and on-chain collection/diversion will become more frequent. Don’t jump to assume it's a whale pump right away... It’s better to clarify the path first before criticizing.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin