Last night before bed, I saw someone again taking "GitHub activity" as faith, and I felt a mix of amusement and anxiety... Frankly, for a newbie like me, I only judge credibility based on three things: whether the code is open source and someone is genuinely reviewing it (not just merging), whether the audit report clearly states the scope and uncovered issues (don't just look at the logo), and whether the upgrade involves multi-signature + delay, who holds the keys, and if rules can be changed with one click. Recently, before major public chain upgrades, everyone is guessing whether projects will move, but I'm more concerned about whether there are public proposals for the upgrade process and who can press the button. Anyway, I don’t blame the market for losing money, I blame my parameters for not being set right, and I also blame myself for not understanding who can modify the contract. That’s all for now.