Lately, everyone’s been talking up AI Agents for automating on-chain operations—it really does make things easier. But let’s be honest: a lot of steps still need a human to cover the gaps. For example, during authorization, even if the agent is smart, it might still approve you an infinite allowance; once the contract goes sideways, it’s just “thanks for participating.” Or take cross-chain routing—between slippage, MEV getting there first, and temporary liquidity getting thinner, the agent will only run according to the rules. The person still has to watch and make sure whether “this trade is actually worth it.” And the most annoying part: when rumors about stablecoin regulation, reserve audits, and de-pegging keep circulating in groups, the agent won’t help you judge the emotional noise—it might even be fed the wrong signals in the process. My approach is still the same as before: keep permissions limited, split the limits into segments, and require a manual second confirmation for key operations. It’s slower, but you can sleep at night. Just take another look.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin