Saying that $ASST outperforms $MSTR simply because it is smaller is a logical fallacy. I'm not convinced the common stock is sufficiently liquid to support the ATM issuance needed to fund a 13% dividend (vs. 11.5% for $MSTR) without putting additional pressure on $ASST shares.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin