Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Calling for Court packing is NOT reform.
It's a fundamental attack on the separation of powers and destroys the checks and balances laid out by the Constitution.
You are literally eroding trust in the highest court because your current politics disagree.
We have had nine justices since 1869. That number has held through two world wars, the Great Depression, civil rights, Watergate, Vietnam, 9/11.
Every generation had reasons to be furious at the Court.
None of them broke the structure. Because they understood something this generation apparently forgot: the Court is not supposed to agree with you.
That's the whole point.
Lifetime appointments exist so justices don't have to care about your timeline, politics or your trending hashtag.
They interpret the law. Period.
You don't get to add four seats because you didn't like a ruling.
FDR tried this exact play in 1937. He wanted to push massive reform for his New Deal and was at peak popularity. His OWN party told him no. Senate Democrats looked at a president trying to stack the bench and said this destroys everything. And they were right.
Because the second you let one president resize the Court to get outcomes, every president after does the same thing. Now you don't have a judiciary.
Every single justice sitting today was nominated by an elected president and confirmed by an elected Senate. That IS the process. You not liking the result doesn't make it illegitimate.
The Court hasn't failed. Politicians openly trashing the highest court in the country because it ruled against their agenda are conditioning an entire generation to believe institutions only matter when they're useful.
And people wonder why trust in government is collapsing. That's how you lose a republic.
So I ask anyone wanting to stack the court? Who's really the king, because it now looks like you.