Lately, I've been checking whether project teams are "seriously committed or not," but I find myself first verifying if the treasury expenditures and milestones match up. It's not about them saving money; it's about whether there's a trace of the money spent: development hours, audits, milestone subsidies, operational activities... Spending more isn't a problem; what worries me is that every month it's "ecosystem cooperation" and "brand exposure," but there's nothing new on the chain, and milestones are forever stuck at the next version.

There's also a more subtle issue: milestones are written very ambitiously, but the timeline keeps getting pushed back, and the treasury is steadily disbursing funds, ultimately only sustained by storytelling. Recently, developers are excited about modularization and the DA layer, but users look confused. I just want to see where their money is really going—are they building usable products, or just making prettier PPTs? Honestly, I prefer them to be slower, but their accounts and progress shouldn't conflict. First, open the umbrella; I'm not afraid of fluctuations, but of the appearance of being lively.