I only realized after I started recording that my way of judging whether "this project is reliable or not" is actually quite emotional: looking at candlestick charts during the day, browsing GitHub at night like scrolling through social media... but at least there's an anchor. For example, if the code hasn't been updated for months and it's all just talk, I automatically deduct points; don't be too superstitious about audit reports either, I check what exactly has been changed, whether there's "known risks left aside," those vague phrases make me more anxious after reading. Upgrading multi-signature is the same, basically it's about "who can move the money," having more people doesn't mean it's safer, the key is whether the signers are independent of each other and if there's a time lock, don’t let everything fall apart if something goes wrong. Recently, the social mining and fan token schemes that promote "attention as mining" are also quite noisy, it looks like neon lights at night: bright for sure, but who pays the electricity bill, who holds the switch... Anyway, I’ll just note down these small details first, so next time I get carried away, I can glance at them and stay calm for ten seconds.