I look at whether the project team is working seriously; the first thing I don't look at is the PPT, but where the treasury funds are spent: whether the proportion of expenses on R&D/auditing/infrastructure can stay stable, whether milestones are progressing monthly, or if they suddenly "market cooperation" skyrockets when the market heats up. To put it simply, only when the budget curve and delivery rhythm match do I think they are actually doing something; if they don't, no matter how much narrative they spin, I’ll remain skeptical. Recently, the debates over privacy coins, coin mixing, and compliance boundaries have been quite divisive, but I’m actually more concerned about whether the team has incorporated risk control into their roadmap—don’t leave the burden on on-chain users to bear themselves.


What I fear most isn’t actually missing out on opportunities, but the risk of the liquidation line being quietly raised without anyone warning.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin