Recently, AI Agents have become all the rage, and I’m itching to give it a try—mostly because of that illusion that “it can run the whole process on its own, so why am I still watching?” It’s like watching someone else’s autonomous driving: you already know it’s unstable, yet you still want to test it. In on-chain interactions, there are actually quite a few steps where I’m really the one who has to step in as the backup. For example, authorization/signing—no matter how smart the Agent is, it won’t take the fall for you. And then there are cross-chain transfers, swaps between pools, and routing—once you click the wrong thing, it’s basically “your money goes traveling,” so humans still need to keep an eye on it. Not to mention when things get stuck, slippage jumps around, or the contract prompts look weird—while the Agent might still be “thinking,” I’m already figuring out how to stop the bleeding. Lately, there’s been a lot of talk about certain regions adjusting taxes and compliance, tightening one moment and loosening the next, and deposit/withdrawal expectations have been a rollercoaster. The Agent might simply execute according to the strategy, but I’ll be the first to get cautious, lowering my positions and leverage… To put it plainly: automation can save time and effort, but for now, the job of taking the blame is still for humans only.