Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Been thinking about something interesting lately. You know how Warren Buffett built Berkshire Hathaway's legendary track record by hunting for companies with real competitive moats? That philosophy actually tells us something fascinating about why he might've missed one of the best plays in the Magnificent Seven.
So here's what happened. For years, Buffett avoided tech entirely. Then around 2016, he finally pulled the trigger on Apple. Later came Amazon in 2019, and Alphabet in 2025. All solid moves - Apple up 966% over the past decade, Amazon up 169% since Q1 2019. But there's this one stock from that elite group that Warren Buffett never touched, and honestly, it's worth examining why.
That stock is Meta Platforms.
Now, I get why Buffett is cautious. The guy famously only invests in businesses he truly understands. He needs to see the products, grasp the financials, understand the competitive landscape. And for a long time, social media probably felt too intangible, too unpredictable. But here's the thing - Meta's economic moat is actually strikingly obvious if you look at it from first principles.
The network effect is real. Meta's apps - think Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp - they become exponentially more valuable as more people join. You can't replicate that overnight. They had 3.58 billion daily active users in Q4 2025. A startup competitor with a few million users? Basically useless by comparison. Plus, Meta vacuums up insane amounts of user data, which powers their algorithm refinement and advertising precision. That's a competitive advantage that only gets stronger over time.
Shares are up 177% over the past five years. Not bad for a company that supposedly has no moat, right?
The interesting part is what happens next. Warren Buffett just stepped down as CEO. Greg Abel is running Berkshire Hathaway now. And you have to wonder - will the new leadership be more willing to venture into sectors the old guard would've dismissed? Maybe we'll see a different Berkshire in the coming years, one that's more comfortable with technology exposure than it used to be.
It's a good reminder that even legendary investors miss opportunities sometimes. Not because the opportunity wasn't there, but because it didn't fit their mental framework at the time. The moat was always there. Warren Buffett just had to wait for the right moment to recognize it.