Recently, someone called AMM "lying down and collecting fees," and I couldn't help but laugh... The curve is right there, and when the price fluctuates, impermanent loss is no longer mysticism, especially in pools with high volatility, the fees earned might not even cover the losses. To put it simply, market making is selling volatility; if you get the direction wrong, don't blame the mechanism for being cold.



AI agents, automated trading, these narratives are also quite noisy now. On-chain interactions have indeed increased, but what I care more about is: who is seriously working on risk control, permissions, and signatures, and who is just stacking concepts. The denoising strategy is simple: don't chase hot words, focus on settlement layer data, and first look at real usage and fee sources. Don't be led by emotions.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin