Lately, a bunch of airdrop interaction tutorials are flying around again, and it’s starting to wear me out a bit. To put it plainly, many projects aren’t really about “rewarding early users” at all—they’re more like using you as liquidity/data/heat to run their metrics, and in the end you might even get “sniped” back: when the witch rules change or a snapshot cuts everything off, the more you interact, the more you end up looking like a script.



My current approach is pretty plain and simple: I only get involved with things I can clearly explain what problem they’re trying to solve, and where the on-chain data doesn’t look like pure volume farming. Every time I interact, I treat it like a “paid trial”—I record the trading fees and time as costs first, and only click if I can afford the loss. And it also helps me understand why retail folks have been complaining a lot lately about validator income, MEV, and ordering fairness… When you interact up front, but then get squeezed a bit afterward—then slippage eats the gains—your whole experience feels like you’re working for someone else. Forget it—plainly speaking: don’t turn yourself into a high-frequency little leek just for an uncertain airdrop. If you can miss it, then miss it; at least don’t let yourself get “educated” twice.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin