Someone in the group is again forwarding screenshots of “a certain stablecoin losing its peg” and “reserve audits being opaque.” As I watch and snack on the drama, I think: cross-chain, put simply, is also a multiple-choice question of “who you trust.”



Once you send it via IBC/message passing, you’re not only trusting Chain A and Chain B themselves—you also have to trust that the light client/verification logic is implemented correctly, trust relayers only as intermediaries who shouldn’t mess things up by inserting anything, and believe that the proof and timeout mechanisms can truly filter out false messages.

If you go through traditional bridges, it’s even more straightforward: multi-signature, oracles, custodial addresses, upgrade permissions… any step that feels shaky can lead to problems.

Anyway, for now I look at how much trust is involved in cross-chain first, and then I decide whether to go over and join the excitement. That’s all for now.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin