My way of watching the mempool is like watching a bus arrive; when I see a project say "audited" or "upgraded," my first reaction isn't excitement, but to see who actually holds the keys. Honestly, GitHub isn't about whether you can write code; it's about whether there's continuous updates, whether changes have been reviewed, and whether critical modifications are suddenly merged all at once. Then I look at the audit reports—don't just look at the logo, focus on what was found, whether issues were fixed, and which unresolved issues were still accepted. Actually, multi-signature upgrades shouldn't make you feel secure just because they say "decentralized"; who the signers are, what the threshold is, whether there's a delay or emergency pause—these are more practical than anything. Recently, NFT royalties have been a heated topic, and I'm even more worried that protocols might just change rules on a whim. As long as I can avoid those "upgradable at any time and not transparent" ones, I’ll stay far away.