Just came across a bunch of "compound returns" from re-staking/sharing security. Honestly, the illusion is that the earliest layers are actually the ones stacking up: you think you're gaining multiple layers, but in reality, you're just doubling the tail risk of the same position, and conveniently raising the exit barrier. What's more annoying is that some protocols hide slash, delayed redemption, and correlation risks like Easter eggs; on the UI, there's only a "expected return"… I find it overwhelming for newcomers. Some people treat on-chain data tool tags as gospel, but now this tagging system is outdated or even misleading. Relying on it for risk control might be overconfident. Anyway, whenever I see the words "shared security," I have to ask: is it sharing safety, or just sharing the blame?