Today I saw that kind of "coincidental transfer" on the chain again, Wallet A just received funds, and the next second it was split and sent to a series of addresses, looking like someone is doing a cipher relay. Basically, many of these can be broken down into paths: first is aggregation/position splitting (even I, with many touchpoints, do this), then bridging or swapping gas, dividing funds into several segments to facilitate tasks across different chains; in the middle, there's a layer of routing contracts and aggregators, and finally it lands on the actual protocol address for interaction. By marking timestamps, UTXO/balance changes of the same funds, and commonly used relay contracts, it’s no longer so "mysterious."

Recently, the staking and shared security setups that are criticized as "profit stacking" have a similar on-chain path, layered like stacking dolls. It looks lively, but who bears the risk can easily be hidden. Anyway, now I record the costs by including each transfer fee and authorization, otherwise when reviewing, I always feel like I spent less money.