When I first got into the scene, I always thought: NFT royalties are just a given, secondary sales should automatically give creators a cut once a sale is made, anyone who opposes that is "unconscionable." Now, after seeing so many heated debates about royalties, creator income, and secondary liquidity, I realize it’s not as righteous and just as it seems... To put it simply, royalties are more like a "default consensus," not an enforced tax. If the transaction side doesn’t cooperate, it turns into a tug-of-war: if you collect liquidity, it’s lacking; if you loosen up, creators feel disheartened.


My current understanding is: if you want stable cash flow, don’t just rely on secondary royalties; you need to create value through primary issuance/equity/community services, with secondary royalties being more of a bonus. I personally tend to reduce my holdings when the market heats up—prefer to earn less than be swept up in emotions and take sides. That’s all for now.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin