Recently, I force myself to slow down when reviewing projects, especially in the areas of GitHub, audit reports, and multi-signature upgrades. To put it simply, beginners don’t need to be good at coding to assess "credibility": first, check if the repository has long-term maintenance and a steady commit rhythm; don’t just look at the cover to see who wrote the audit, flip to "Fixed/Unfixed/Out of Scope," some pitfalls are obvious and left untouched; then look at upgrade permissions, involve multiple people, see if roles are independent, and check for delays (giving everyone time to respond), this is more practical than just saying "decentralized." Recently, there’s been talk about regional tax increases, tightening or loosening compliance, and as everyone’s deposit and withdrawal expectations shift, emotions change quickly... I actually prefer to be a bit slower, first confirm permissions and change paths, and only then talk about funds. Anyway, I’d rather miss the hype now than step into upgrade pitfalls.